Mitt Romney for President, MyManMitt.com
About Us
Contact Us
Donate to Mitt Romney Campaign

Mitt Romney on the Issues
Videos Mitt Romney
Help Mitt Romney




Saturday, September 15, 2007
posted by Anonymous | 12:14 PM | permalink
Nice article on Josh Romney's recent trip to Alaska to stump for his dad, which I found interesting mostly because the Romney team is clearly doing everything they can to campaign on all fronts.

Josh's post about the trip is here.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • DiggJosh Romney in Alaska
  • Fark:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • Furl:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • Ma.gnolia:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • Netscape:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • NewsVine:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • Reddit:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • Slashdot:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • StumbleUpon:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • TailRank:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • Technorati:Josh Romney in Alaska
  • YahooMyWeb:Josh Romney in Alaska

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



Friday, September 14, 2007
posted by Anonymous | 12:38 PM | permalink
David French had an interesting post yesterday about Romney's war stance over at Evangelicals for Mitt. The basic question is whether Mitt is anti-war. The answer is obviously no, but Romney, unlike McCain, Thompson, and to a lesser extent Giuliani, has not over committed to any particular policy in Iraq if he were elected President. This derives from the fact that he didn't play any part in getting us into Iraq and wants to have flexibility in making decisions that would be in America's interest.

We do a disservice to ourselves when we get too wrapped up in these games. People who understand the nomination process for judges understand this. If a potential Supreme Court Appointment is on record as saying the Roe v. Wade should be overturned, that nominee is headed for trouble. It is much better to have a nominee who hopefully will not have to directly answer that question because it is so unpalatable to the other side and will result in their being torpedoed.

When we consider who is the best person to nominate for President, we know Romney does not have the baggage of Iraq and hence can appeal to those people who want someone strong on terror, without alienating independent voters who wish we had never invaded Iraq. If you buy Gingrich's "need a clean break" from the current administration, Romney is the best prospect. Part of the reason Romney is so feared by the Democrats is precisely because they will have a hard time saddling him with the anti-war sentiment in the country.

If Romney is forced into saying he would have invaded Iraq, even if he would have, that statement is going to be used with great effect in the general election against him, much like Thompson's TV ad urging the invasion will be used against him.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Romney and the Iraq War
  • DiggRomney and the Iraq War
  • Fark:Romney and the Iraq War
  • Furl:Romney and the Iraq War
  • Ma.gnolia:Romney and the Iraq War
  • Netscape:Romney and the Iraq War
  • NewsVine:Romney and the Iraq War
  • Reddit:Romney and the Iraq War
  • Slashdot:Romney and the Iraq War
  • StumbleUpon:Romney and the Iraq War
  • TailRank:Romney and the Iraq War
  • Technorati:Romney and the Iraq War
  • YahooMyWeb:Romney and the Iraq War

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



posted by Anonymous | 12:27 PM | permalink
Strength of Conviction is another good entry in the Romney create your own ad contest. Actually, this user has several good movies. The reason I like this one is because it focuses on core Republican themes that Mitt Romney stands far above the competitors on.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • DiggRomney Ad Contest Continued
  • Fark:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • Furl:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • Ma.gnolia:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • Netscape:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • NewsVine:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • Reddit:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • Slashdot:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • StumbleUpon:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • TailRank:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • Technorati:Romney Ad Contest Continued
  • YahooMyWeb:Romney Ad Contest Continued

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



posted by SteveT | 9:53 AM | permalink
At least that is Fred Thompson's voting history according to a new article by David Brody at CBN:

"The most stark example was his 1995 vote on the welfare overhaul, when he voted to preserve illegal aliens' ability to receive federal benefits. He was one of just six senators to vote that way, joining four other Republicans and one Democrat. "

He also voted against an employment verification system:

"And in 1996, as Congress considered a crackdown on illegal aliens, Mr. Thompson voted against setting up a system so employers could verify the legal status of their workers. "

Fred has a lot of explaining to do. When compared to Romney, the differences are clear. Mitt ran for governor in 2002 opposing bilingual education, and then after winning, he implemented a program making sure all kids were educated in English. His record also includes:

Opposing driver's licenses for illegals
Vetoing instate tuition for illegals
Developing a program to have state police enforce immigration laws

Romney is the only major pro-enforcement candidate in the race. The record could not be more clear.

Link to full Brody article:
http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/225944.aspx
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Thompson to Illegals,
  • DiggThompson to Illegals,
  • Fark:Thompson to Illegals,
  • Furl:Thompson to Illegals,
  • Ma.gnolia:Thompson to Illegals,
  • Netscape:Thompson to Illegals,
  • NewsVine:Thompson to Illegals,
  • Reddit:Thompson to Illegals,
  • Slashdot:Thompson to Illegals,
  • StumbleUpon:Thompson to Illegals,
  • TailRank:Thompson to Illegals,
  • Technorati:Thompson to Illegals,
  • YahooMyWeb:Thompson to Illegals,

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


Am I the only one who has noticed that not only does Fred Thompson look old, Fred Thompson looks REALLY, REALLY old? When he was sitting across from Jay Leno, I kept thinking and wondering if anybody that Leno has interviewed ever looked SO old. And I kept wondering how the guy expected to live through the interview, let alone even 4 years of a Presidency, one of the most life-shortening jobs in America. So, imagine how old Thompson would look over 9 years from now when he would theoretically be finishing his second term. It brings pictures to my mind of Constantine or one of those ancient emperors who were so old and frail that they did all of their governing and made all of their decisions from their bed because they were too weak to get out of bed. Then again, Thompson is an actor, so maybe it’s just an act and he’s just pretending to look so old.



In fact, when Tom Tancredo drops out, Romney is the only guy I think he could honestly endorse.




Thursday, September 13, 2007
posted by Anonymous | 2:37 PM | permalink
Fred Thompson is having a difficult time trying to run against Washington because too often, he is actually running against, well... himself.

His discussion of the No Child Left Behind Act is just another example...

The Issue: "'We've [emphasis added] been spending increasing amounts of federal money for decades, with increasing rules, increasing mandates, increasing regulations,' Thompson said." Yes, you have.

The Problem: "'No Child Left Behind — good concept, I'm all for testing — but it seems like now some of these states are teaching to the test and kind of making it so that everybody does well on the test — you can't really tell that everybody's doing that well. And it's not objective,'" Yes, when you require kids to know math for the test, teachers tend to teach well... math.

The Solution: "Instead, he said the federal government should be providing block grants as long as states set up objective testing programs. He said his message to states would be, 'We expect you to get objective testing done and publicize those tests for the local parents and for the local citizens and suffer the political ramifications locally if things don't work out right.'" Everyone make up your own test, we'll give you the money no matter how bad you do.

You can also see Thompson complain about the problems of the No Child Left Behind Act on his Principles of Federalism page of his website.

Sound like a good Federalist? There's a little problem though: Thompson voted for the No Child Left Behind Act!

There is a current debate about the re-authorization of the No Child Left behind Act. Some people for, some against. Romney has supported the goals of federal testing:

"'We all want to be successful based on our rhetoric, not actual, measurable results, and I'm afraid that in the world marketplace, our kids are only going to be successful based on their performance, and that requires measurement,'"

"He added: 'I think the president was right to insist on measurement. I think the measurements themselves have a long way to be perfected, and a lot of room for improvement.'"

The problem with Thompson's approach is you eliminate any benefit to the program while still spending the federal dollars. If you are going to get rid of federal standards, get rid of federal funding and let the local government decide.

Since my wife taught in public schools, I am sensitive to the complaint that the desire of districts to keep the federal funds has made the federal department of education the de facto arbiter of curriculum. But we need a talented and skilled workforce to compete in the 21st century and I know Romney understands this from his business experience and that his time as Governor helps him to understand the practical interplay between the federal government and the states on this important issue.

On the other hand, I expect someone who is trying to convince me that the expansion of federal education spending tied to testing standards violates principles of federalism to not be responsible for the very program they are complaining about. "Shucks, that bill I voted for, it's awful. We should scrap that one." Thanks for reading beforehand, Senator.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • DiggRunning Against, Well... Yourself
  • Fark:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • Furl:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • Ma.gnolia:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • Netscape:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • NewsVine:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • Reddit:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • Slashdot:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • StumbleUpon:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • TailRank:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • Technorati:Running Against, Well... Yourself
  • YahooMyWeb:Running Against, Well... Yourself

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


Fred's a mess. When will this start catching up with him (his poll #s)?



Unfortunately, probably not until a couple of weeks before the first primary, as most primary voters in most states do not follow the candidates - YET. For instance, only 45% of those knew Mitt won the Ames. Only 20ish% could identify Rudy as the only pro-choice candidate in this side of race. And all of those are with the media bombardments we have had!




posted by Kyle Hampton | 11:18 AM | permalink
Douglas Schoen says that Rudy Giuliani will not be the Republican nominee. Shoen looks at the state polls and sees a bleak picture for Giuliani. Based on the current picture of state polling, Giuliani faces the very real prospect of not winning a single state before Feb. 5:
No biggie, Giuliani's people argue - they are sitting in the catbird's seat when Feb. 5 rolls around. That's the day a half dozen big states go to the polls. But while Giuliani holds leads now in major, moderate states such as New York, Florida, California, New Jersey, Connecticut and Illinois, politics is like pool: The first shot changes the next one. If Giuliani loses to Romney in the first three states and to Thompson in South Carolina, a strong Super Tuesday showing is a fantasy.

This is a theme that I've been playing with for some time now. Admittedly, I am no electoral analyst, but even a cursory look at the history of electoral politics shows that Giuliani is tempting fate by banking on these large states. Says Lary Sabato in his latest entry over at the Crystal Ball (his emphasis):
Mesmerized by the numbers in fairly meaningless national surveys that mainly measure name identification and personal familiarity, the DC doyens cannot stop talking at their Georgetown cocktail parties and on their TV shows about the all-New York match-up (maybe Michael Bloomberg, too, they add excitedly). We'll see. Maybe it will end up that way, but if it does, it will be because the Empire State candidates win the campaign starting this month. Real people, even most activist voters, do not make up their mind on presidential choice until they have to do so. In Iowa and New Hampshire, still the most crucial nominating states despite all the tinkering with the schedule, voters are tough-minded and wonderfully heartless in picking the people who probably will be the general election standard-bearers. We look forward to some egg-on-face retrospectives on mainstream media coverage if those influential early voters decide to ignore the Beltway script. Should Hillary and Rudy both fall, it will be omelet-on-face treatment.

Labels: ,

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • DiggSouring on Rudy, too?
  • Fark:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • Furl:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • Ma.gnolia:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • Netscape:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • NewsVine:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • Reddit:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • Slashdot:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • StumbleUpon:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • TailRank:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • Technorati:Souring on Rudy, too?
  • YahooMyWeb:Souring on Rudy, too?

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



posted by Justin Hart | 10:00 AM | permalink
If this seems like a hit piece on Thompson... I apologize in advance. Just note... I'm not doing the hitting... I'm just the librarian.

First, from CBN's David Brody. After noting that Thompson simply misspoke. claiming that no state legislatures had approved gay marriage (California has just this last week), Brody questions aloud:
[Thompson will] take some heat for that but the larger issue for social conservatives may be this: If California start to have legislatures endorse gay marriage and have a liberal Governor sign it into law then what Thompson is saying is that he'll live with that because it didn't come from an unelected judge but rather elected representatives. How will that go over with conservative pro-family groups?

Now from a largely pro-Fred camp, Erik E from Redstate has this to say about Fred's campaign and their faux pas using "Osama" and "due process" in the same sentence:
One would hope that on the fundamental, driving issue of national security -- the issue that is driving so many as we head toward 2008 -- having to backtrack on the very basic issue of what to do with Osama would be unnecessary.

The first Thompson statement was a tacit endorsement of the Clinton policy this nation repudiated after September 11th.

And at this stage in the game, even Hillary Clinton has answered more competently on that subject that the Thompson campaign's first stab at it.

That the campaign required a second stab at that basic question makes me shudder with disbelief.

Next from the Washington Post with George Will:
Fred Thompson's plunge into the presidential pool -- more belly-flop than swan dive -- was the strangest product launch since that of New Coke in 1985. Then, the question was: Is this product necessary? A similar question stumped Thompson the day he plunged.

...

"Right now"? He has been living "up there" in that upscale inside-the-Beltway Washington suburb, honing his "Aw, shucks, I'm just an ol' Washington outsider" act, for years. Long enough to have noticed that McLean is planted thick with churches. Going to church is, of course, optional -- unless you are aiming to fill some supposed piety void in the Republican field.

New Coke was announced on April 23, 1985, with the company's president piling on adjectives usually reserved for Lafite Rothschild -- "smoother, rounder yet bolder." Almost 80 days later, the public having sampled it, the company pulled the product from stores. Perhaps Thompson's candidacy will last longer than New Coke did.

Next up, Paul Weyrich from Townhall.com:
It is not entirely clear what Thompson believes. When he was Senator he seemed to support an open-borders approach to immigration. In recent speeches Thompson has not supported President George W. Bush's comprehensive immigration reform bill, which was soundly defeated.

...

If the Thompson balloon were launched high but then returned to earth, with Thompson falling behind other candidates, that would mean the several-month tease in the form of his exploratory committee would have been for naught.

Lastly, Gail Collines from the NYT:
When it comes to overhyped underperformers, Fred Thompson's entry into the presidential race was right up there with Britney Spears at the MTV awards.

The Republican Party's great tall hope announced his intentions on Jay Leno's show, and timed it to coincide with his avoidance of the candidate debate in New Hampshire. That was supposed to send the message of - what? A fear of crowds? A preference for answering questions only while seated? His performance certainly could not have been more low-key. You do not often hear somebody say "I'm running for president" in the same tone Jay's guests use to announce that they've signed on for the next season of "Dancing With the Stars."

Labels:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • DiggPundits Souring on Thompson
  • Fark:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • Furl:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • Ma.gnolia:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • Netscape:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • NewsVine:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • Reddit:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • Slashdot:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • StumbleUpon:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • TailRank:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • Technorati:Pundits Souring on Thompson
  • YahooMyWeb:Pundits Souring on Thompson

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



posted by SteveT | 6:33 AM | permalink
I would like to introduce myself. My name is Steve. After contacting Jason Bonham, I was invited to post on this blog, which I appreciate the opportunity to do.

I'll give you a little background of who I am and why I have become a strong supporter of Mitt Romney. I started my involvement in politics in 1994, by volunteering for a Republican US Senate candidate in my home state. Then, I preceded to take a job in the state legislature as a legislative aide for the next couple of years. From there, I spent several years working for a state health association that did government relations and member services.

After that, I decided to make real money and go into sales. Over the last couple of years, I have been able to set up a health related business selling products to hospitals in the upper Midwest. Now on to the good stuff.

The 2008 election is one of critical importance and the decision of which candidate will carry the GOP banner is the most important of all. When looking at the major candidates in the field, Mitt Romney stands out as someone who has provided real leadership on both social and fiscal issues. He is the one candidate that can restore leadership in Washington and unite the party.

As someone who started their involvement in politics in 1994, I remember his US Senate candidacy in Massachusetts. About a month before the election, one poll had him within a couple points of Teddy Kennedy and I remember thinking, "It is impressive that someone as conservative as Mitt Romney is making a race of it in Massachusetts."

While he did not win that race, he did win the governorship in 2002. After getting elected Mitt did not disappoint. He went right to work cutting government spending across the board and enacting a ballot initiative that ended bilingual education (something he had supported in the 2002 campaign). The sponsors of the ballot initiative noted how rare it was to get support from a Republican candidate for governor as they had not received support like this in other states that had similar initiatives.

As you all know, over the next several years, Mitt fought aggressively against a rogue Massachusetts Supreme Court to try and preserve traditional marriage. He held the line on taxes and attempted to reduce them. Mitt vetoed provisions providing instate tuition for illegals and opposed driver's licenses for illegals as well.

Of his many accomplishments as governor, his health care initiative is particularly important. As someone who works in this field, I can tell you it is refreshing to see a Republican stand up and fight for the free market in health care in this country. Alone among the candidates running for president, Governor Romney fought to deregulate the health insurance market and grow the market for private insurance. The last which is absolutely critical to maintaining a private health system. Mitt has actually done these things, not just adopt a list of Cato Institute talking points for the election!

In the general election in 2008, Mitt will bring much to the table. He will be able to challenge the Democratic candidate from a position of strength on health care and restore Republican integrity on fiscal restraint and competence in international affairs. I look forward to working with all of you to help Mitt win this thing in 2008!
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:New Blogger - Steve
  • DiggNew Blogger - Steve
  • Fark:New Blogger - Steve
  • Furl:New Blogger - Steve
  • Ma.gnolia:New Blogger - Steve
  • Netscape:New Blogger - Steve
  • NewsVine:New Blogger - Steve
  • Reddit:New Blogger - Steve
  • Slashdot:New Blogger - Steve
  • StumbleUpon:New Blogger - Steve
  • TailRank:New Blogger - Steve
  • Technorati:New Blogger - Steve
  • YahooMyWeb:New Blogger - Steve

Technorati Tags: |
 
3 Comments:


Great to have you here Steve!



Welcome to the fray.



I am a newly handicapped person and am able to read what "everyone" puts out & what You just wrote about Mitt is the most impressive honest thing I've read and that alone brought me into voting for him. I also am sharing this with ALL of my other Hospital friends who share these discussions over who's "our choice!"




Wednesday, September 12, 2007
posted by Devon Murphy | 4:21 PM | permalink
Yes or no, consider the following.

Governor Mitt Romney is proposing a tax-free savings plan for 95% of Americans. Read about it HERE:

Any taxpayer with Adjusted Gross Income of under $200,000 would pay a tax rate of absolutely 0% on all of the income they earn from their savings, capital gains and dividends.


What does that mean for YOU, Joe Blogger? Typical savings accounts these days give around 5% return...mutuals return around 8%. Typical tax rates on those savings range between 15% and 20%. The result is an annual tax of (at least) 1% on your family nest egg, which Mitt Romney wants to give back to you in full. So if you have $10,000 in savings, that's $100 every single year. Why not donate the first year of that to the man who's gonna get us there?

Donate to Mitt! 1% of your savings nest egg is a good start, and President Romney will see that you get it back every year! Already hit 1%? Say so in the comments!

Labels: ,

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • DiggHave YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Fark:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Furl:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Ma.gnolia:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Netscape:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • NewsVine:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Reddit:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Slashdot:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • StumbleUpon:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • TailRank:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • Technorati:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?
  • YahooMyWeb:Have YOU Donated 1% To Mitt?

Technorati Tags: |
 
6 Comments:


The link you should use for 'Donate to Mitt!' should be https://www.mittromney.com/contribution/form:fid=588000

That will automatically put 588000 in the Fundraisers ID field automatically, and it can't be changed. Try it.



Thanks Nate! It's updated now!



I worked for GWBush in the GOTV endeavor in 2004, but Mitt Romney is the only candidate who has ever inspired me so much that I reached into my checkbook and made donations to his campaign.

(This might seem like an awkward sentence-but I was taught to never end a sentence with a preposition.)

Mitt Romney is the Man!!



I'm a tightwad too-never donated- sending lotsa cash to Mitt. It's for the kids. Signed, another Beth



Greetings, Another Beth!

I just got a bumper sticker in the mail from Mitt and put it on my bumper (next to My Son Is In The Air Force!).

I will be proudly driving around the San Francisco Bay Area with those two bumper stickers!!



Both Beths, great work!

If you see a white Nissan with a Romney bumper sticker, be sure to honk!




posted by Justin Hart | 8:34 AM | permalink

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • DiggNew Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Fark:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Furl:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Ma.gnolia:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Netscape:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • NewsVine:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Reddit:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Slashdot:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • StumbleUpon:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • TailRank:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • Technorati:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"
  • YahooMyWeb:New Romney Ad in Florida: "Energy"

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


----
Has the Thompson camp responding to this "Energy" ad by Romney yet?
---
It is clearly an attack on Fred's lack of physical stamina.
----
And what is it with that photo of Mitt, Ann and a Grandbaby? Is that an attack on Freddie's young children?
---



It is exciting to see the attention turn to Florida.




posted by jason | 1:31 AM | permalink
Team Thompson:



"There is no room in our party for this kind of smut. As the top executive of his own campaign, Gov. Romney should take full responsibility for this type of high-tech gutter politics and issue an immediate apology. In addition, Gov. Romney should exercise some of his much-touted executive acumen, take control of his flailing campaign, and immediately terminate anyone and everyone related to this outrage.


Does anyone really think Team Thompson is this angry? does anyone really think they have been hurt by this?

Here is what we can learn:

1. This is good for fodder, nothing else.

2. Either Team Thompson is really upset (wow- thin skin!), or is he living up to the website name that he is so "upset" about?

3. Thompson is excellent at playing the victim, he's done it in every campaign so far. He makes Al Sharpton look like an amateur.

Are we going to get 4 months of Thompson and his surrogates playing the victim card? Really, I thought he was going to add something to the debate, not enhance the circus.

So much for high hopes.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:This is Dumb
  • DiggThis is Dumb
  • Fark:This is Dumb
  • Furl:This is Dumb
  • Ma.gnolia:This is Dumb
  • Netscape:This is Dumb
  • NewsVine:This is Dumb
  • Reddit:This is Dumb
  • Slashdot:This is Dumb
  • StumbleUpon:This is Dumb
  • TailRank:This is Dumb
  • Technorati:This is Dumb
  • YahooMyWeb:This is Dumb

Technorati Tags: |
 
4 Comments:


Jason, I just read this post over at race42008.com and I posted my comment there.

It's unbelievable how petty this whole thing is -- very junior-highish.

If this is how Team Thomspon responds to "someone who worked for someone who is partners with someone who is affiliated with the campaign," I can't imagine how they are going to deal with the rest of this campaign season. It is not going to be pretty.

In the meantime, the "real" story is that Fred Thompson said "no" to Gov. Huckabee's offer to accept Thompson's invitation to a Lincoln/Douglas style debate. (just try to wrap your brain around that sentence! ;)"

I imagine that with all of Mitt's prior executive experience -- hiring, firing, dealing with staff, etc. he has a pretty good handle on knowing the appropriate way to deal with something like this.

I think his response was appropriate and an apology would just have been ... well ... just so unnecessary.

Some of Mitt's rivals seem to have a black hole of need for apologies from him.

What's with that anyway?

I really think they're just jealous and threatened by him.

No one else is getting this kind of "hate talk."

What do you make of it?



Tacky, tacky, tacky.
----
They must be REALLY araid of Mitt.



Are we going to have to call a WAMMMBULANCE for little Freddie Dalton Thompson?
---
The more I think about his repsonse the more I think it adds to stack of reasons why this man can't handle being POTUS.
----
What is he going to do when MOVEON.Org calls his wife nasty names or attacks his children?



Be careful what you say folks, Thompson might be coming for you!




Tuesday, September 11, 2007
posted by Anonymous | 2:42 PM | permalink
Today, Governor Mitt Romney issued the following statement on the sixth anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001:

"On this day, radical Islamists brought terror to our shores. It is hard for our minds to contemplate a human darkness so vile that it celebrates murder and the destruction of innocent lives. But we can honor the bright memories of the fallen. Each person, whether taken in unknowing sacrifice or resigned to death after heroic struggle, stands in our mind's eye in the brilliant light of faith and patriotism. In the years since 9/11, the spreading evil of radical Jihad has been visited on other cities around the world. Yet, our resolve remains strong. From soldiers guarding our liberty on foreign shores to those of us living under the umbrella of the protection they provide, we are united in remembering loved ones lost on that day and in our determination to protect our homeland from future attacks."
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Remembering
  • DiggRemembering
  • Fark:Remembering
  • Furl:Remembering
  • Ma.gnolia:Remembering
  • Netscape:Remembering
  • NewsVine:Remembering
  • Reddit:Remembering
  • Slashdot:Remembering
  • StumbleUpon:Remembering
  • TailRank:Remembering
  • Technorati:Remembering
  • YahooMyWeb:Remembering

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


Beautifully said.



Muslims Against Sharia commend Governor Romney for clearly defining the enemy and standing up to Islamist lobby and PC establishment.

Link to video




Monday, September 10, 2007
posted by jason | 12:09 PM | permalink


[Update]
Contest for the best guess in the comments section.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • DiggWho dunnit? [Update]
  • Fark:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • Furl:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • Ma.gnolia:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • Netscape:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • NewsVine:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • Reddit:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • Slashdot:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • StumbleUpon:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • TailRank:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • Technorati:Who dunnit? [Update]
  • YahooMyWeb:Who dunnit? [Update]

Technorati Tags: |
 
11 Comments:


This is tough.

On the one hand, Rudy's got all this talk about "taking the high road". On the other hand, does anyone REALLY ever "go legit" after years in the business?

Then there's lazy Fred, who obviously hasn't fit into a cat burglar suit since the Nixon administration. Maybe he got his wife to do it while he had another Bud?

But this really seems right up old J-mac's alley, if it weren't for the fact that J-mac's ex-recon staff was recently seen waiting tables at a local TGIF in NH.



It was the Clintons. They fear romney the most. They've been up to this kind of stuff lately. Check out the following article: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57556



Before I answer I would like some more information.
.
Was a golf cart seen in the area at the time of the break-in?



GeorgiaMom,

I believe we should ask the BPD to put out an APB on an old man in a Golf Cart with computer equipment.



I'm betting that any footprints left are a match for gucci loafers.



Brandon, that was just what I was going to suggest, so that is my vote.



Its a bit suspicious too that it happened on the eve of the Petraes hearing. Whoever did it knew it would be washed down the front page. Sound Clintonesque to me.



Can't be Fred. Can you imagine how much fabric it would take to make a cat-burgler suit that would conform to all those wrinkles?



Please don't go after people who don't have a history of this sort of thing, even in jest. Accuse the Clintons if you want(that website clearly showed they have a history of this behavior, Brandon P), but don't accuse Thompson of anything. Doing so is really below us. Don't forget that Thompson could be campaigning for Romney next year.



It was the paulistinians.....More laptops = more worthless online votes! The online world is doinated by these morons, imagine if they controlled all computers!!



I'm not sure we can point to any one culprit. I think is more likely the result of a vast left-wing conspiracy!




posted by jason | 11:34 AM | permalink
FLASH: ROMNEY FOR PRESDIENT HEADQUARTERS BROKEN INTO; LAPTOPS, TV TAKEN... DEVELOPING...


From Drudgereport
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • DiggRomney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Fark:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Furl:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Ma.gnolia:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Netscape:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • NewsVine:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Reddit:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Slashdot:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • StumbleUpon:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • TailRank:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • Technorati:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into
  • YahooMyWeb:Romney Head Quarters Broken Into

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


Figures....

Now the question is, who did it. And was it politically motivated?



The AP has released a story now. I hope they used good passwords.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RINEB80&show_article=1




posted by Justin Hart | 8:42 AM | permalink
As you may know, the Romney campaign is sponsoring a whole slate of fundraising events at the end of the month. The "Rally for Romney" will be very exciting. Make sure you sign up for your local event!


Labels: ,

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Rally for Romney
  • DiggRally for Romney
  • Fark:Rally for Romney
  • Furl:Rally for Romney
  • Ma.gnolia:Rally for Romney
  • Netscape:Rally for Romney
  • NewsVine:Rally for Romney
  • Reddit:Rally for Romney
  • Slashdot:Rally for Romney
  • StumbleUpon:Rally for Romney
  • TailRank:Rally for Romney
  • Technorati:Rally for Romney
  • YahooMyWeb:Rally for Romney

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



Sign up for MyManMitt
Enter your email address:

RSS Feed MyManMitt.com
Mitt Romney Facebook MyManMitt
Mitt Romney YouTube






Copyright 2007 MyManMitt.com