Jonathan Martin has a piece up about the fundraising race for the second quarter. Mostly it talks about the expectation gaming that each candidate is doing. Some (i.e. McCain) have more pressure than others to lower the bar so as to exceed expectations. Obviously each campaign is working furiously to get as much as possible. Martin had one note in particular that I found amazing:
While his public schedule has been markedly light, at least compared with Romney and McCain, Giuliani has kept up the fundraising pace. His campaign declined to say how many total events they did for the quarter, but said they’ll do around 50 in June alone.
Romney had 30 events scheduled for June. McCain had 35. Obviously, McCain and especially Rudy are doing their best to generate cash.
I think the point of all this, for us Romney supporters, is that we need to increase our efforts to support Romney. Personally, I think Romney is the president that this country needs: smart, innovative, a strong and effective executive, personally upright, god-fearing, and most importantly has the vision and message to confront the challenges that face us now and in the future. He's really the type of man and leader that comes along only about once a generation. That he is running for president is really amazing. Thus, we should seize the chance to help in Romney's efforts to lead this wonderful country.
There are several ways to donate. Here at MMM or over at the official campaign website. Help make the second quarter as successful as the first quarter!
I personally expect Giuliani to post the highest numbers this quarter. I would be surprised if McCain does much of anything. Romney needs to post a close second to Giuliani, if not exceed him, to maintain the impression this is really a two man race (I've decided candidates who won't declare they are running for President don't count). Romney needs to continue the momentum. This is a marathon but the pace must be brisk. Time to dig deep and beg my wife to let us donate more money.
he New Hampshire Attorney General's Office has opened an investigation into whether presidential hopeful Mitt Romney's staff might have made an illegal traffic stop, the same day a group of conservative activists with a connection to rival Sen. John McCain complained Thursday.
ConserveNH President Paul Nagy wrote a letter to Attorney General Kelly Ayotte asking her to check if Romney aides illegally stopped a New York Times reporter, checked his license plate against a database and overstepped their role.
"We want attention to the indiscretion," said Nagy, who said he is not supporting a candidate. "I think there is a bunch of arrogance involved in this. We just don't do that to guests when they visit our state during the presidential primary season."
One of ConserveNH's founder, Patrick Hynes, works for McCain's political action committee, Straight Talk America.
So lets take a look at some ConserveNH's leaders:
1. ConserveNH was founded, and presumably ran by Doug Lambert, Skip Murphy, Paul Nagy and Patrick Hynes.
2. Doug Lambert and Skip Murphy both claim that they are no fans of Romney.
3. Pat Hynes is a paid consultant of McCain's and needs no introduction. From all accounts he is an excellent blogger and real "nice" guy, so I am not here to knock on him personally.
4. It's not too hard to find tough-on-Mitt-pieces-easy-on-McCain-pieces at Lambert and Murphy's blog.
5. For Paul Nagy (who actually petitioned the AG) attacking Romney is nothing new.
Now lets looks at the two causes ConserveNH has taken on:
2. Protecting innocent NYTimes reporters, by calling for an investigation by the State Attorney General into Mitt Romney.
It doesn't take much thought to come to a quick conclusion the ConserveNH is really a puppett group for attacking Mitt Romney. An online petition with a whopping 600 signatures and official request to investigate Romney. I cannot confirm that they are in the bag with McCain- because their is nothing beyond circumstantial evidence in my view. But, (and that is a big "but") it's highly probable in my opinion.
Now lets take a look at some of the claims ConserveNH is making on this:
Nagy said the letter was sent independently of the McCain campaign and said he was unaware that Hynes is on McCain's payroll.
"I know nothing about that. I could not tell you who any of the members of the board are supporting," said Nagy, who is a critic of McCain's immigration plan.
...uh...Naggy, you only have 4 people on your board and you have no idea Hynes was a paid consultant of McCain. Wow.
"We want attention to the indiscretion," said Nagy, who said he is not supporting a candidate. "I think there is a bunch of arrogance involved in this. We just don't do that to guests when they visit our state during the presidential primary season."
Apparently Nagy has two things they want to protect: Marriage and scared NYTimes reporters who stories are unsubstantiated to this point. I believe this is the first time a Conservsative action group has taken up the cause of protecting the NYTimes.
Lastly...
McCain's New Hampshire spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker flatly denied any connection between the campaign and the letter.
"You would be hard-pressed not to find a McCain supporter in just about any New Hampshire organization. Mr. Nagy's statement speaks for itself," she said.
Noticed she said "supporter" in the singular form. Judging by McCain's New Hampshire numbers that sounds about right.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
By the way, the campaign has flatly denied pulling anyone over. Which makes sense. How would they have pulled the reporter over? They didn't have lights and sirens. What, were they hanging out the window asking them to pull over? It doesn't make any sense. What makes sense is that the reporter was already stopped. Just because someone talks to you at your car though doesn't mean you were pulled over or that there was an illegal traffic stop. The reporter is making that up.
Scott Helman of the Boston Globe (a pretty cool guy in my limited interaction with him) has written a pretty enlightening piece about how the rival campaigns of McCain, Giuliani, and Brownback have all had official campaign staff attacking Mitt's Mormon faith. It's been happening here in Iowa.
Gathering for their April meeting at the county courthouse, Republican activists from Warren County, Iowa, planned for this summer's county fair and vented about illegal immigration.
And then the county chairman for Senator John McCain's presidential campaign, Chad Workman, made an unexpected digression: He took direct aim at Mitt Romney's religion, according to four people at the meeting.
Workman questioned whether Mormons were Christians, discussed an article alleging that the Mormon Church helps fund Hamas, and likened the Mormons' treatment of women to the Taliban's, said participants, who requested anonymity to discuss the meeting freely.
One participant summed up Workman's argument this way: "The fundamental flaw of Mitt Romney . . . was that he was Mormon, not because he thinks this way or that way on one issue."
Workman did not return calls seeking comment.
Next Iowa example:
Emma Nemecek, an Iowa field operative for Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, had recently forwarded an e-mail to Iowa Republicans containing a number of criticisms of Mormonism, including a charge that it is not a Christian faith. The e-mail closed with a quote from a Founding Father, John Jay: "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers."
I know Emma and like her. I even put her campaign sign in my yard when she was running for the legislative seat last election cycle. I was disappointed by her action, but I also know that she's a very energetic and involved individual. I'm willing to cut her some slack and write this off as an over-exuberance in supporting her boss. I'm sure she's been frustrated in not "converting" many folks over to Brownback because they are firm Romney supporters. What she did was unacceptable, but I maintain that she is a good person and a good Republican.
Hearkening back to the first example:
The April meeting in Warren County is one of several instances in which a representative of McCain's campaign has tried to highlight Romney's membership in the Mormon Church.
Last year, when Romney and McCain were battling to sign up supporters in key states, Romney's campaign got word that Chuck Larson, a former Iowa GOP chairman and now one of McCain's top Iowa advisers, had been calling Mormonism a "cult" while trying to woo state legislators and their staff. One Republican Larson approached, who would talk only on condition of anonymity, said that Larson told him, "He's a Mormon for crying out loud -- that's essentially a cult."
When David Kochel, a senior Romney adviser in Iowa, learned of Larson's comments, he complained to Larson's business partners. Larson then called back to apologize, according to Kochel, who recounted Larson's apology this way: "David, I just want you to know that I made a joke about Governor Romney's religion. It is not the kind of thing I'm proud of, and it's not the kind of thing I will ever do again."
Larson declined to comment.
There have been other scattered instances of McCain representatives raising Romney's religion. Earlier this year, for example, The State newspaper in Columbia, S.C., reported that McCain operatives had distributed to reporters comments by evangelical leader James Dobson questioning whether a Mormon could win the presidency.
The attacks are coming from non-campaign places as well.
Romney has faced repeated slights against his religion from other quarters as well. A Florida televangelist, Bill Keller, told followers recently that a vote for Romney is a vote for Satan. And a small group of worshipers from the Faith Christian Outreach Church in Mount Pleasant, Iowa, has been going door-to-door distributing a DVD that takes a critical look at the Mormon Church.
"Our concern was simply that Mormonism has continued to try and pass itself off as a Christian religion, which it is not," said Monte Knudsen, senior pastor at the church, who insisted the effort was not aimed at hurting Romney's candidacy.
There's not a whole lot of stuff to attack Romney on . . . so we will continue to see these kinds of desperate and misguided "whisper campaigns".
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
This kind of garbage makes me so sad. It is unbelievable that rival candidates' officials would stoop to such low levels of campaigning, and I wonder how much of it they actually believe themselves. Digressing here a little, I am reminded of the pharisees and sadjucees of the New Testament, how they dictated religious law and what was acceptable and nonacceptable practice. They completely missed the point of Christ's message and ended up rejecting the Messiah. I wonder how many evangelical "Christians" do the same today with these kinds of words and deeds.
These people are so very petty. What small minds they must have that they have to attack a rival's belief system. Is this what they consider "Christian Outreach?" Shame on them.
I think that McCain is just shooting himself in the foot. He will not only fail to be President but will never be elected for any other public office in Arizona again at this rate. Does he know how many LDS people voted him into office? Who will making that mistake again? I certainly won't.
the leads in these state are even more impressive considering they all vote before or on Feb. 4th. Also don't forget that the latest poll out of CA has Romney with a big lead. If he wins there, he wins the nomination. Go MITT! http://www.dryflypolitics.com
Obviously, good news for Mitt. Also, have you guys seen this? The Fred Thompson campaign has been misrepresenting their ratings from NRTL (Right To Life)- Only 33% in 2001-02 (Not 100% as they claimed).
A pattern is developing here. This fits in with not remembering being pro-choice, or not remembering supportng McCain-Kennedy last year. Here is the Link: http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070623/EDITORIAL/10623006/1013 Posted By ST.
The story today about the left-leaning contributions of reporters gives me a great excuse to disclose a few things. I have no problem doing this because:
A) Everybody already knows who I support B) I'm not a reporter
I'm proud of the fact that I announced my intentions to support Mitt Romney in November of last year. I was so convicted of this fact that I dropped my long time personal blog (Right Side Redux) to focus on building MyManMitt.com. It's a risk I don't believe I will regret.
MyManMitt has been a great success raking in over 1200 users a day after starting from scratch in January. Jason Bonham, my cohort in this effort, and numerous other bloggers have made this a reality.
I should note that you don't have to endorse a candidate if you are on a committee (although it's likely most members do). Being part of the committee in no way indicates that I am a campaign "official" as some have implied.
Disclosure #2
I am now a paid consultant for the campaign. This was more of a fluke than anything else. I am not consulting them on blogging (they have Stephen Smith for that)... rather I have a really nifty computer and the a decent speaking voice. Read on...
The campaign is using SalesForce.com to manage relationships with potential donors. The vast fundraising team uses this tool to give them a dashboard of money raised etc...
SalesForce.com is a great tool but it requires some training. I thought I would help my fellow unpaid fundraisers and put together a video demonstrating some of the functions of the application. I submitted the video screen capture to the campaign.
They loved it! But, they are clean-nosed crew and said they had to pay me for it.
Disclosure #3 As many of you know I have taken a position as Vice President of Communications for the Lighted Candle Society. This new job requires a lot of attention so I will probably be scaling back my MyManMitt activities a bit. Since I have a more public position I will probably be cautious about all of my dealings going forward.
If your interested... we could certainly use your help at the Lighted Candle Society. More info here.
LCS is a non-profit organization with a unique vision on how to win the culture war.
Our primary fight is against pornography and the damage it inflicts on families, individuals and society.
We do this by supporting civil litigation against pornographers. (A little legal jujitsu, taking a page from the ACLU). To find out more click on the logo below and sign up to help us:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Apparently Giuliani made a poor choice for a state chairman in South Carolina. Thomas Ravenel was indicted on a cocaine charge on Tuesday. From The Greenville News:
[Larry] Sabato said the incident reflects on Giuliani, who accepted Ravenel's aid when he was first putting his campaign together and most of the state's top Republicans had committed elsewhere.
Giuliani, he said, has "egg -- no, omelet -- all over his face. To say this was a poor choice for his state chairman is an understatement," Sabato said.
"In a speech that Mr. McCain is delivering here today on Latin America, he calls for reestablishing the United States Information Agency as an independent agency. “Dismantling an agency dedicated to promoting America and the American message amounted to unilateral disarmament in the struggle of ideas,’’ he will say, according to excerpts of the speech obtained from the campaign.
"The Romney campaign lost no time in pointing out to reporters that Mr. McCain voted for the 1998 bill that merged the United States Information Agency with the State Department – a bill that also authorized payments to the United Nations and authorized spending for the State Department."
Much has been made of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s recent switch from Republican affiliation to unaffiliated. Of course the question right away has been “Who does this hurt?” Chuck Todd has his thoughts:
Looking at voting patterns and the strength of both parties' bases, a true three-way race may help the Democrats more than the Republicans. Why? It’s simple -- the South. The irony of a Bloomberg candidacy is that it could make the Democrats more competitive in the South because their 35% base vote in the South is made up of die-hard Democrats.
Moreover, is it inconceivable that the logic Todd & Co. use about the South might also have applicability in the Northeast and California? Splitting the limousine liberal vote in New York, New Jersey, Conn., California and Mass. could change the dynamics for a Republican quite favorably (depending on the Republican). Indeed, the Republican contender wouldn't need to actually win all or almost any of these states in this scenario. He could however force a Hillary or an Obama to spend time and money in areas a Democrat should have locked up.
Personally I think that Goldberg is too conservative in his assessment. A piece by Ben Smith at the Politico sums up some of Bloomberg’s positions on issues:
His political and personal views are more in line with moderate Democratic Party politics: His first major act as mayor was a large property tax increase, his most controversial was a citywide ban on smoking, and the signature accomplishment of his first term was an education reform that mixed centralized control with increased spending.
Vocally opposed to remarriage for himself, he favors the right to same-sex marriage and has confessed not only to smoking marijuana but to enjoying it.
Does this sound like someone taking the votes of social conservatives, foreign policy hawks, or fiscal disciplinarians? It seems unlikely at the least. Rather, assuming that Bloomberg is against the war in Iraq, it seems likely that Democratic-leaning independents would vote for Bloomberg rather than Republican-leaning independents. People are presented with two options for an anti-war, big government, socially liberal candidate. None of those positions lines up well with Republican voters.
Of course, all the fanfare is much ado about nothing given that we all know that Romney will win, regardless of who he’s pitted against.
McCain seems to be literally obsessed with Romney. I guess it's that whole dying gasp thing. First he was going to open www.mittvstruth.com, then he was thinking about it, now it's definitely off the table. Now he is in Massachusetts taking pot shots at Romney, all the while sinking himself into presidential obscurity:
BOSTON - Sen. John McCain said Monday he hopes to take advantage of former Gov. Mitt Romney's sagging support at home and lead a resurgence of the Republican Party in the northeast during the 2008 presidential campaign.
``One of the Republican Party's problems right now is we're not doing as well as we should in the northeastern part of America, and I intend to work very hard to gain their support and their votes,'' the Arizona Republican said during a stop at the Taj Boston hotel for a fundraiser.
Has anyone told McCain about his local party in Arizona and their thoughts on him?
McCain was flanked by Former Acting Governor Jane Swift (emphasis on acting.) Jane offered some underhanded criticism of Romney as well:
``I think that John McCain is a man of integrity who has certain positions that he is not willing to change for political expediency,'' said Swift.
You might remember Mrs. Swift as the fine Republican Governor who the local GOP loved so much they decided to look for another governor. Romney is why she has no job. From what I understand this is the same reason Utah Governor John Huntsman joined McCain as well, he was hoping to be the Salt Lake Olympics CEO. Didn't quite happen.
So what do you get when you stack a candidate with supporters who are continually getting snubbed over for Romney? This.
What do you get when you have a candidate who is more concerned about serving the Nation then tearing down his competitors? This.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Guys, Good Job! Where are the Mitt Romney Banners, Bumper/Car Window Stickers, Name Tags, Hats,Shorts, Ties etc. Is there a site to purchase these items?
In response to: "Where are the Mitt Romney Banners, Bumper/Car Window Stickers, Name Tags, Hats,Shorts, Ties etc. Is there a site to purchase these items?"
Jason has done a tremendous job posting videos over the last few days. To help facilitate this venture we give you (with a generous hat tip to Patrick Ruffini's 2008 wall) the Mitt Romney Iowa Video Wall:
Romney is asked by blogger Jeff Fuller of Iowans for Romney and travel buddy extrodinaire his opinion on his rivals making personal attacks. One of his best answers the whole weekend in my opinion.
Importance of Vietnam Veterans
Afterwards I found this man and he said he was very satisfied with Romney's answer.
More on Veterans
Second part to the previous question on Vietnam Veterans.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
I went to wikipedia like you said, but I couldn't find the "tearing down" by the fredheads. Is there a particular section they have defamed? I went there all ready to be infuriated, but it was quite anticlimactic when I got there :)
Marc Ambinder over at the Atlantic has a small preview of what will be an important decision from the Supreme Court in Wisconsin Right to Life v. The Federal Election Commission. The case challenges McCain-Feingold's restrictions on speech. Wisconsin Right to Life was represented by one James Bopp. Most of us Romney followers know him from his advising role to Governor Romney, but in the conservative movement he is most prominently known for his role in arguing conservative causes before the Supreme Court.
Obviously this decision will have political implications (that Ambinder lays out nicely). At the basic level, a win for WRTL would be a win for Romney. A win for the FEC would be a win for McCain and possibly Thompson, who was also a big part of passing McCain-Feingold. However, if the FEC wins this case, I can't see that McCain will suddenly have a boost in popularity. Conservatives are decidedly against McCain-Feingold and upholding the constitutionality of the law would not suddenly sway conservative votes.
The decision is supposed to be out today and I will have my take as soon as I can read it.
At every event little cards where passed out to everyone in attendance. When they fill out the cards they are committing to a candidate. I took a picture of the stack of returned cards at one event. There were about 120 people at this event, and this is the stack they received. Just because you are at the Romney event did not mean you supported Romney.
At this event I sat at a table of 8. There were 2 democrats who were there just to learn (a very nice elderly couple), a young man named "Tim" with a video camera who I am not sure who he was supporting- and the rest were supporters. Many of the people I talked were there just to meet Mitt and get a look. The campaign was excited to see so many cards.
Every where I went I met people who were very dissatisfied with those who were dropping out of Ames. Many took it very personally for their home state; perhaps realizing that McCain and Giuliani had completely disregarded the state GOP and in effect the Iowa Caucuses. To quote Tancredo, "THEY WERE GOING TO LOOSE!!!"
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
While at a BBQ in Ames Romney Told a funny sheep joke. He really has a great self deprecating sense of humor. Honestly I am not a good camera man, so he looks more like a shadow here, but you get the picture- no pun intended.
Primary Season
Romney takes a question on the long primary season. It's a good answer. This was in Cedar Rapids, at an event with about 400, by far the largest. Interestingly, most events were around 100 people with fairly good access. After this event Romney stood in a line outside and shook everyones hand that left. Unfortunately I was stuck in the back of a long narrow room without a tripod which meant close ups where shaky and wide shots left me with bright lights in my face.
Energy Independence
Romney takes a question on Energy independence in Cedar Rapids.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Here is a response from Mitt at an "Ask Mitt Anything" Townhall meeting, and a great video showing Ann Romney's humorous side.
Debutt in Dubuque
Ann Romney fell down at a morning time "Ask Mitt Anything" meeting in Dubuque, Iowa on Saturday. The stand that Mrs. Romney was on had not been set up properly and gave out when she stepped on it causing her to fall to the ground. Ann immediately got up and started telling jokes about having been previously bucked off a horse that week. Off course none of this stopped CNN.com from posting a dirty article that at first said she had misjudged the step and that she suffered from MS. Later they noted the stage gave out, but still reminded us of her MS with a not so flattering photo. Biased??? You be the judge.
This video is of her making a joke about it to Mitt and then walking out to the car afterwards.
Politician or Statesman?
An audience member asked what the difference is between a politician and a statesmen and which is Romney. Romney gave an excellent reply.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tonight and tommorow I am going to start uploading some of the videos and Pictures from Iowa. I had a great time. Needless to say, the Iowa Campaign is strong, and within a couple of events it was very obvious to me why McCain and Giuliani chose the route of retreat.
Some quick impressions and then I will provide a narrative with videos and pics over several posts during the next day or so:
1. Ann Romney is an amazing person. I had the chance to talk with her a few times over the weekend. Undoubtedly, a spectacular lady and truly a first class human being. I am positive that Mitt would not be the candidate and person he is without the influence of her- and I think with this new home movie they have released we can all see why.
2. Mitt Romney is the energizer bunny. Me and Jeff Fuller were worn out by the weekend. We followed him everywhere we possibly could for 3 days, and were dead. Mitt was the one who had to perform. And he never seemed out of sync or without the right answer. It's amazing to consider the schedule he, or for that manner any of the candidates, have to keep up.
3. People walk out of meeting with Mitt on Fire. The governor knows how to campaign. Everywhere we went everyone was impressed. I don't think I met anyone who walked away unimpressed except for one guy who kept muttering, "What a liar"- I think for him it was an impossible task. I guess that and another guy named "Tim." Hi Tim!!!
4. Jeff Fuller is an Iowanian Icon. Something of a legend if you will.
5. Iowa was an amazing place, and it was a fantastic way to spend a Fathers Day Weekend.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Wow! What a cool family! I am happily jealous of them. Family has a way of keeping you humble - especially your children -- Mitt has 5 boys and by marriage, by girls. They love him unconditionally and aren't afraid to tell him the truth. He seems like a truly humble man. Some people have trouble believing that because he looks and sounds so good. People must think, "He has to be arrogant." Not true. I have a yoga teacher who is gorgeous - perfect body, face, hair, smile -- and she is one of the most giving and loving people I know. She's beautiful from the inside out. I think this is true of Mitt and Ann. God has truly blessed them. And like one of their sons said on this video, "Mitt has been lucky, too."
Thank you for opening up your family to us...all of you...There are many of your extended family that have not had the opportunity to meet you but are all behind you! Hopefully America will harness your success and solid foundation and put it to work for our country...we need your leadership. I wish all Americans could watch this! Wishing you the best... Bruce Romney in Dallas, TX
Show/Hide 1 Comments | Post a Comment