Mitt Romney for President, MyManMitt.com
About Us
Contact Us
Donate to Mitt Romney Campaign

Mitt Romney on the Issues
Videos Mitt Romney
Help Mitt Romney




Friday, January 18, 2008
posted by Myclob | 8:06 AM | permalink

This is why people hate the media, especially AP

Posted January 17th, 2008 at 4:20 PM by Jon Ham

Check out AP reporter Glen Johnson badgering Mitt Romney in South Carolina. He's slouching in a chair like Jabba the Hut. pecking at his laptop, and being as obnoxious as he possibly can. Go to the every end where the man tells him to just "be professional," which he certainly was not.

If you want to read some of Johnson's "objective" stories on Romney, here's a good example. Once a reporter uses the verb "rail" when characterizing a politician, you know where he stands.

And here's an "analysis," which is newspaper speak for "I get to say any damn thing I want." Too bad you don't see this kind of AP coverage of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

And here's a cute one trying to smear Romney with the polygamy practiced by his great-grandfather. (Sorry, but the link to the original story seems to be bad.)

It must have killed him to have to report Romney's win in Michigan. Check out his tortured lede (emphasis added):

Mitt Romney scored his first major primary victory Tuesday, a desperately needed win in his native Michigan that gave his weakened presidential candidacy new life. It set the stage for a wide-open Republican showdown in South Carolina in just four days.

UPDATE: If you want to know what AP's agenda is, read this piece of drek from Ron Fournier.

The former Massachusetts governor pandered to voters, distorted his opponents' record and continued to show why he's the most malleable — and least credible — major presidential candidate.

And it worked.

More proof that liberals hate achievement, I guess. And then he added:

The man who spoke hard truths to Michigan lost.

That man, according to Fournier, is John McCain, the liberal media's favorite Republican.

2 Responses to "This is why people hate the media, especially AP"

  1. Jon Sanders Says:

    Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.

    And Fournier has had some odd columns in his day.

  2. Jon Sanders Says:

    Right now ABC News video (via Yahoo) is advertising the video under the heading: "Riled! Angry Romney rips reporter."

    To the depths with ABC for making me defend Romney, but I've watched the video twice, and as best I can tell, the only two words in that heading that are accurate are "Romney" and "reporter." Romney did not show anger, he wasn't riled, and if that's what ABC defines as getting ripped, they wouldn't last five minutes on the sidelines at a Pee Wee football game.

    If anything, Romney looked incredulous and annoyed that anyone could be that dense. A more accurate heading would have been "Dunderhead! Rude reporter badgers Romney."

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • DiggAre you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Fark:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Furl:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Ma.gnolia:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Netscape:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • NewsVine:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Reddit:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Slashdot:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • StumbleUpon:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • TailRank:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • Technorati:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.
  • YahooMyWeb:Are you sure Johnson was typing? He was dressed to play virtual Dungeons & Dragons.

Technorati Tags: |
 
6 Comments:


I just sent info@ap.org an email complaining about Glen Johnson's obvious bias, and how this reflects poorly on Associated Press. They might not care, but I don't think they like to be in the spotlight either.
Speaking out is how things like this get fixed.



Based on some extended video of this, I think Glen Johnson’s elevated lack of professionalism was a product of his increasing realization that not only was Romney the man who could beat whatever liberal is nominated but that conservatives are recognizing (what Johnson has already known) that Romney was the strongest conservative candidate.
Someone at this conference suggested that Rush Limbaugh had endorsed Romney. Eric Fehrnstrom had to correct this statement because while Rush has been talking up Romney and down Huck and McCain for about 1 week solid, he endorses nobody.
I think it most likely that Johnson’s semi-unprofessional behavior became radically unprofessional because he does not want the liberal candidate to face Romney in the general.
As Rush has been saying the media’s love of Huck and McCain and their dislike of Romney are strong indicators that conservatives should look away from Huck and McCain while looking toward Romney. This is just the spill over reaction of a fairly unprofessional journalist as he saw the writing on the wall. I think those who have already seen that Romney is the best candidate should encourage others to view this as an unintentional endorsement of Romney as the liberal media’s (Glen Johnson’s) greatest fear.
Thanks, TOm



Interesting... while watching CNN this morning, they showed highlights from each of the campaigns... Hill, Barack, John and Huck speaking in front of enthusiastic crouds....

but for Romney? Well, they showed a 10 second piece of his argument with the reporter selecting only the most angry portion and cutting off his voice when he started to make his argument.

That was all they showed on Romney. Does that seem balanced to you?



Here is the Boston Globe’s take on Rush Limbaugh’s “endorsement” of Romney that I claim Glen Johnson is railing against.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/18/limbaughs_praise_for_romneys_run_heard_loud_and_clear/
I think it would be good to get this article some more intention. My father told me 2 weeks ago that Romney will not win because the Conservative establishment will not let it happen. I told him of the National Review and Novak’s endorsement which tempered his position a little.
That being said, I think the truth is that the national media has presented an anti-Romney case that an increasing number of folks are seeing through. Committed conservative journalists like Novak have endorsed Romney. Rush’s support is just the latest manifestation of conservatives trying to support the best candidate despite who the media thinks conservatives should support.
I think this Boston Globe article should receive some more attention. I work so I hear Rush for 15-30 min a day at the most. I was aware of his attacks on Huckabee and McCain, but it was through the net that I found how much positive he has said about Romney.
Thanks, TOm



Here's what I wrote to the AP

Are there any plans to remove Glen Johnson from covering the Mitt Romney campaign?

It is obvious to any observer that he has lost any objectivity as demonstrated by his heckling of Mitt Romney during his press conference in South Carolina.

I am not completely familiar with professional journalistic conduct, but I understand that it is inappropriate for journalists to comment or question during a press conference until (or even if) the offer for questions is given. Anything otherwise can be considered badgering or heckling as in this situation.

It your statement on "News Values and Principles" (http://www.ap.org/newsvalues/index.html) you state

"we avoid behavior or activities that create a conflict of interest and compromise our ability to report the news fairly and accurately, uninfluenced by any person or action."

and that

"Any time a question is raised about any aspect of our work, it should be taken seriously."

I think it has been well established that Glen Johnson's ability to report the news fairly and accurately, uninfluenced by anything has been compromised and I hope that you will take this seriously to avoid any loss of credibility.

Thanks.



Everyone here seems to be of the opinion name calling is a good thing. I detest that behavior in all forms by anyone.

Glen, for whatever the meaning, voiced what he believed bad information. There was some truth in it, Romney expressed the details and explained how Glen was wrong.

I was disappointed with the Romney and especially with his handler. It seemed like strong arm tactics.

Just an observation...




Sign up for MyManMitt
Enter your email address:

RSS Feed MyManMitt.com
Mitt Romney Facebook MyManMitt
Mitt Romney YouTube






Copyright 2007 MyManMitt.com