posted by jason | 11:38 AM |
permalink
Brody file has the
scoop on Romney's stance:
“Governor Romney effectively used available federal funds through the Title V program to implement abstinence education in Massachusetts classrooms. The governor feels that it is important for this alternative to remain available for school districts who want to promote the teaching of abstinence to our young students. As he has said in the past, Governor Romney never had any parent complain to him that their kids are not learning enough about sex in school, but a number of parents wondered why we don’t speak more about abstinence as a safe and preventive health practice.
Brody then adds this commentary:
Pretty straightforward on abstinence only programs but is the Governor OK with federal dollars being used to support some of those other comprehensive sex ed programs? I asked that question in a follow up to the campaign two days ago. I never did get a response on that.
I really hope the answer to this is no federal funding on sex education. I am guessing that Romney would say no federal funding but allow states to make their own choices. If states pick up the tab, that would be their choice; but I hope even then he would say government has no role in educating youth about sex- therefore while legal it is inappropriate.
Here is quote from a 2006 press release:
“In my service as Governor, I’ve never had anyone complain to me that their kids are not learning enough about sex in school. However, a number of people have asked me why it is that we do not speak more about abstinence as a safe and preventive health practice,” said Romney.
“Abstinence education gives young people the support they need in making the decision to postpone sexual activity until they are mature enough to handle the emotional, moral and financial responsibilities of parenthood,” he said. “This is more than teaching kids to say no – it will help them preserve self-esteem and build character.” Link
| 1 CommentsPost a Comment