posted by jason | 3:33 PM |
permalinkPolitical columnist Charlie Cook and Stuart Rothenberg
pick Hillary and Mitt as the two likely nominees.
Of Clinton Cooke says:
Cook described Clinton’s campaign as one of “Prussian efficiency,” more like Richard Nixon’s campaign in 1972 and certainly “more organized than any Democratic campaign that I’ve ever seen.”
But Clinton also has a liability – 46-48 percent of Americans “won’t vote for her no matter what. If she were a stock, she’d have a very narrow trading range. There’s no room for error. She’s cautious and she doesn’t make mistakes.”
Pretty fair diagnostic of Clinton. My diagnostic would trade the word "efficiency" for "vomit." But there is no need to go there right?
But this is beginning to fit a pattern, IMO. Romney is seen by many as the eventual nominee- think GOP insiders poll from a month ago. If it were to turn into a Romney/Clinton match up I am pretty convinced Romney would take it in a landslide. For certain Clinton would bring out the daggers, but the Anti-Clinton machine is already operating in full gear. Besides all we need to do is ask Clinton where all of her husbands
bodyguards?
1 Comments | Post a Comment